This week underscored the complexities of budget negotiations and the diverse perspectives within the state's legislative body, reflecting the ongoing debates about fiscal responsibility, taxation, and the role of government in providing services to its citizens. Here's a recap of the key events:
Budget Approval Amidst Intraparty Tensions
The South Carolina House of Representatives passed a $14 billion state budget with a 99-13 vote, accelerating the state’s planned income tax cut from 6.2% to 6%. The budget discussions highlighted a rift within the Republican Party. The House Freedom Caucus, a group of fewer than 20 conservative Republicans, pushed for a larger income tax reduction to 5% by cutting $1 billion in spending.
Their proposed alternative budget suggested eliminating entire state agencies to fund the tax cut, ending tuition freezes at state universities, and significantly reducing funding for agencies such as the South Carolina Arts Commission and Sea Grant Consortium. However, these proposals were met with resistance from mainstream Republicans and House leaders, who deemed them impractical and emphasized the importance of maintaining essential services.
The approved budget aligns with Governor Henry McMaster's executive budget, which emphasizes fiscal responsibility, accelerated income tax cuts, and investments in critical infrastructure and disaster relief.
Removal of DEI Proviso
Under South Carolina House rules, any proviso added to the budget must specifically address the allocation of funds. Over the course of 22 hours of debate on the $14 billion spending plan, several amendments proposed by the House Freedom Caucus were ruled out of order for not explicitly directing how money is spent.
One of the most contentious issues was a proposed proviso to prohibit state funding for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Democrats effectively used procedural rules to have the DEI-related proviso removed, arguing that it did not pertain directly to budgetary allocations. House leaders ruled that the proviso violated House rules because it aimed to impose a policy change rather than direct the allocation of state funds.
Other amendments proposed by the House Freedom Caucus—including efforts to defund the state agencies like the South Carolina Arts Commission and the Sea Grant Consortium—were also ruled out of order for not adhering to the guidelines on budgetary relevance. House leadership maintained that while policy changes can be proposed through standalone legislation, the budget process should remain focused on financial appropriations.
Other Budget Highlights
The budget includes several key provisions:
Teacher Pay Increases – A $1,500 salary increase for teachers, raising the starting pay to $48,500 annually.
Hurricane Helene Relief – The budget allocates $270 million to address damages from Hurricane Helene, with an additional $50 million designated for the South Carolina Department of Transportation to cover expenses related to road repairs and clearing operations following the storm.
State Employee Health Insurance – For the first time in over a decade, state employees will be required to contribute more toward their health insurance premiums, as the state will no longer cover the entire cost.
Infrastructure Investments – $200 million is allocated for bridge maintenance and repair, aiming to improve the state's infrastructure.
Education Funding – Beyond teacher salary increases, the budget provides $61.2 million for tuition mitigation, maintaining the tuition freeze for current students, and increased funding for early childhood education and school facility safety measures.
The budget now moves to the South Carolina Senate for consideration, with debates expected to commence in late April.
S.374: Increasing Juvenile Detention Costs to Reduce Overcrowding
South Carolina senators advanced Senate Bill S.374 to reduce overcrowding at the state’s juvenile jail by increasing the cost counties must pay to detain juveniles. Since 2007, counties have paid $50 per day per juvenile, though the actual cost is closer to $400. The bill, sponsored by Senate Corrections Chairman Shane Martin, would require counties to cover two-thirds of the cost through contracts with the state agency. The Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) hopes higher costs will discourage unnecessary detentions and encourage alternative interventions.
Current Challenges and Proposed Solutions
DJJ’s juvenile facility, which has a capacity of 72, regularly houses about 120 youth, costing over $17.5 million annually while counties only contribute about $2.2 million. Most detained youth are between 13 and 18 years old, though there’s no minimum age for detention under state law. The bill also allows DJJ to refuse youth from counties that fail to pay.
Director Eden Hendrick emphasized that alternatives like group homes and after-school centers, costing $180 to $300 per day, could save counties money in the long run. Sen. Ross Turner suggested expanding programs like Greenville County’s Generations Group to handle nonviolent offenders.
Impact of Recent Closures
Richland County’s closure of its juvenile wing last fall added about 45 more youth to the already overcrowded state facility. Charleston County remains the only county with its own juvenile detention center. DJJ plans to rent Greenville County’s closed juvenile wing to reduce overcrowding and keep Upstate youth closer to home.
Status Offenses and Potential Reforms
Hendrick also called for removing jail time as a punishment for status offenses (e.g., truancy, running away, and false ID use), which South Carolina remains the only state to detain children for.
The bill will move to the full Senate Corrections and Penology Committee for further discussion and a vote.
S.244: Tort Reform Bill Stalls
The Senate left Columbia late Thursday without a deal on the issue of tort reform.
The bill, S.244, seeks in part to limit liability payouts to people or companies seeking damages in an effort to lower liability insurance rates.
Legislative Schedule
The House plans to hold a perfunctory session next week, meaning they won't meet as a full body on the floor but will return for committee work.
Commentaires